Saturday, January 12th, 2008 週六， 2008年1月12日 Danah Boyd points out that the center for social media has released an informative paper entitled Recut Reframe Recycle concerning the boundaries of fair use (fair dealing in Canada) in digital media. danah博伊德指出，該中心為社會媒體已發布了翔實的文件，題為recut重新循環有關的分界公平使用（公平交易在加拿大）在數字媒體的需求。 Types of use they point out: • Parody and satire • Negative or critical commentary • Positive commentary • Quoting to trigger discussion • ...類型的使用他們指出： •模仿和諷刺•負面的評論或批評•積極評•引用引發討論• ... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Monday, January 8th, 2007 週一， 2007年1月8日 More signs that the music industry is realizing just how bad DRM is for business and experimenting with distributing music without digital rights controls: "The majors . . . have got to capitulate, or they will continue to have a fractured digital media market that will slow down and stagnate," says ...更多的跡象顯示，音樂產業，是實現公正如何壞DRM是商業和實驗派發音樂的數字版權控制： “專業。 。 。不得不投降，否則將繼續有裂縫數字媒體市場將緩慢下跌和停滯，說： “ ... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, November 28th, 2006 週二， 2006年11月28日 Chris Anderson of Long Tail fame "cheekily" coins freeconomics as shorthand for his more recent thesis on "economics of abundance".克里斯安德森的尾巴很長名利“ cheekily ”硬幣freeconomics作為速記，他較近期的論斷，關於“經濟學天府之國” 。 (I should mention that he does so with apologies to Freakonomics) Anderson points out how technology that was once scarce is fast becoming a cheap enough commodity to be offered ... （我應提及，他這樣做與道歉freakonomics ）安德森指出，科技如何，這是一次珍貴的是迅速成為廉價足夠的商品提供... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, November 28th, 2006 週二， 2006年11月28日 There is a gold rush on intellectual property, testing the coherence of IP law.有一個淘金關於知識產權，測試的連貫性，知識產權法。 Many are bordering on the absurd, here is an example reported at Techdirt: more bizarre is the lawsuit the company is facing down in Chile where Microsoft dared to offer a version of its software in the ...許多接壤的荒謬的，在這裡就是一個例子報導，在techdirt ：更奇怪的是官司，該公司正面臨下跌在智利微軟不敢提供一個版本的軟件，在... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Monday, November 27th, 2006 週一， 2006年11月27日 The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a law in the United States which criminalizes technology which circumvents copyright. 1998年的數字千年版權法案（ ）是一部在美國的犯罪行為的技術，繞過版權。 It has been widely criticized.它已被廣泛批評。 Ed Felten at Freedom to Tinker reports some exceptions to the DMCA were recently granted: six exemptions were granted, the most ever: * Professors ...教育署felten在自由廷克報告有一些例外，以DMCA的，最近被授予：六人獲得豁免，最以往任何時候都： *教授... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| 1 Comment » 1條評論»
Thursday, October 26th, 2006 週四， 2006年10月26日 Most of us remember Telus taking a huge misstep on the network neutrality issue by blocking access to its union website.我們大多數人還記得TELUS公司採取了巨大的失誤對網絡中立性問題，阻擋進入其聯盟網站。 In an amazing about face Telus seems to have done some homework, obviously doing a bit of soul searching to figure out its role in the information economy.在一個了不起的關於面對TELUS公司似乎已做了一些功課，顯然是做了一點自我反省，以計算出它的作用在資訊經濟中。 CEO Darren ...公司首席執行官達倫... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, September 5th, 2006 週二， 2006年9月5日 UPDATE: Google has bought YouTube for 1.6+ Billion and there is a hell of a debate going on surrounding Mark Cuban's criticism of Google's purchase and the actual value of YouTube given that it does not use DRM, therefore requiring copyright holders to monitor the site themselves and constantly ask them ...更新： Google已經購買的YouTube為1.6億+是有地獄的辯論，將會對周圍馬克庫班的批評， Google的購買和實際價值的YouTube ，因為它不使用DRM的，因此需要版權持有人，以監察自己的網站並不斷要求他們... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Sunday, June 4th, 2006 週日， 2006年6月4日 In my previous post I argue that internet neutrality legislation could help ease the transition to an internet society and economy.我在以前的郵政我認為互聯網中立的立法可以幫助緩解過渡到互聯網的社會和經濟。 On further thought and debate I'm not really sure that regulation would be the most constructive response to the threat of network discrimination.關於進一步的思考和辯論，我不是真的確定規例將是最有建設性的威脅作出的反應網絡的歧視。 The internet has a long history ...在互聯網上有著悠久的歷史... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006 週二， 2006年5月23日 In his post "Fair Use and Network Neutrality" Lessig draws a connection which did not seem to previously exist but appeals to me as I have been looking for an excuse to talk about both in the same breath.在他的郵政“公平使用和網絡中立” ，萊斯格提請連接，其中似乎沒有以前存在，但我呼籲，正如我一直在尋找的藉口，談談雙方在相提並論。 He says: "...in a fundamental sense, fair use (FU) and network neutrality ...他說： “ … …在根本意義上說，公平使用（富）和網絡中立... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Thursday, January 26th, 2006 週四， 2006年1月26日 In a significant ruling reported by EFF and Boing Boing, Google's cache is ruled to be legal and consistent with fair use.在一個重要的裁決報告，由EFF和boing boing ， Google的快取記憶體是裁定是合法的和一致的公平使用。 This likely helps pave the way for the book search project: The court granted summary judgment in favor of Google on four independent bases: Serving a webpage from the Google ...這可能有助於鋪平道路，該圖書搜索項目：法院批准簡易判決有利於Google的四個獨立的基地：服務網頁從Google ... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Sunday, January 22nd, 2006 週日， 2006年1月22日 Following the debate on fair use is a great way to dive into information economics.辯論之後，對合理使用是一個偉大的方式潛入的信息經濟學。 We all know and love that various kinds of media (audio, video, print...) are used to create songs, movies and books (or more generally "works").我們都知道和熱愛，各種媒體（音頻，視頻，打印... ）是用來建立歌曲，電影和書籍（或更普遍的“工程” ） 。 These information creations are economically important as they are often ...這些資料的創作是經濟重要，因為它們往往是... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Friday, January 20th, 2006 週五， 2006年1月20日 Now is a truly amazing time to be alive for the curious and adventurous - opportunities to do what you enjoy for a living have never been better.現在是一個真正的令人驚嘆的時光，要活著，為好奇和冒險-機會做你喜歡為生活而從來沒有更好的。 The information available on obscure interests is amazing.現有的資料對模糊的利益，是了不起的。 There is lots to be optimistic about as the future will continue to bring ...有很多是持樂觀態度，作為未來將繼續帶來... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| 1 Comment » 1條評論»
