Sunday, July 2nd, 2006 週日， 2006年7月2日 Adam over at Emergent Chaos clarifies some Network Neutrality concepts for his readers in his post Innovation, Emerging From Chaos.亞當超過在急診混亂，澄清一些網絡中立性的觀念，他的讀者在他的郵政創新，擺脫混亂。 He points out that "the regulatory apparatus has fairly clearly been captured by the regulated".他指出， “規管儀器已相當清楚，被抓獲所管” 。 Basically the big telecom corporations have learned how to thrive on regulation, and this has implications ...基本上是大型電信公司已經學會了如何發展壯大的規管，這已影響... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Thursday, June 29th, 2006 週四， 2006年6月29日 Cory Doctorow, famed for his debunking of DRM technology, writes an excellent article on the net neutrality issue, or "internet freedom" as I like to call it.多克托羅的Cory ，著名的為他駁斥DRM技術，寫一個很好的一篇關於淨中立的問題，或“互聯網自由”正如我在此呼籲。 He drives home some important points: ...there are few industries that owe their existence to regulation as much as the carriers.他驅動器首頁的一些重要點： … …有幾個產業，欠他們的存在，以規管多為載體。 These companies are ...這些公司的... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Sunday, June 4th, 2006 週日， 2006年6月4日 In my previous post I argue that internet neutrality legislation could help ease the transition to an internet society and economy.我在以前的郵政我認為互聯網中立的立法可以幫助緩解過渡到互聯網的社會和經濟。 On further thought and debate I'm not really sure that regulation would be the most constructive response to the threat of network discrimination.關於進一步的思考和辯論，我不是真的確定規例將是最有建設性的威脅作出的反應網絡的歧視。 The internet has a long history ...在互聯網上有著悠久的歷史... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006 週二， 2006年5月23日 In his post "Fair Use and Network Neutrality" Lessig draws a connection which did not seem to previously exist but appeals to me as I have been looking for an excuse to talk about both in the same breath.在他的郵政“公平使用和網絡中立” ，萊斯格提請連接，其中似乎沒有以前存在，但我呼籲，正如我一直在尋找的藉口，談談雙方在相提並論。 He says: "...in a fundamental sense, fair use (FU) and network neutrality ...他說： “ … …在根本意義上說，公平使用（富）和網絡中立... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
Tuesday, October 26th, 2004 週二， 2004年10月26日 Why does "information want to be free"?為何不“信息要成為自由”呢？ I think the phrase is a good way of explaining to most people that information is really hard to treat like property.我認為這句話是一個很好的方式解釋，大多數人的資料，實在是很難處理想的財產。 The cost of reproduction and transportation is absurdly low, thus it is trivial to distribute freely, in the sense of "free as ...成本的繁殖和運輸是荒謬的低，因此，這是微不足道的分發自由，在意識“免費為... Posted in Uncategorized |張貼在未歸類| No Comments »沒有評論»
